|
Re: Wapr3D SI: the fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/2 21:59
#21 |
---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/2 3:55 From Italy, Perugia
Posts: 2745
|
@m3x
Quote: 640x480 - 30.2 FPS Mmm it's not too mutch considering the big difference between our systems, I hope there will be room for further optimization ! @zzd10h Can you do a complete test with all the 4 resolutions above ? |
|
|
Re: Wapr3D SI: the fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/2 23:19
#22 |
---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/11/27 16:55 Posts: 224
|
X1000 @1800mhz
Radeon R9 280 @ 850Mhz ----- Cow 3D 93-94 fps ----- Quake2 Texture quality = full 8-bit textures = yes Sync every frame = no Lockmode = manual Map = Demo1 320x240 56.8fps 400x300 56.9fps 512x384 55.9fps 640x480 55.3fps 800x600 53.8fps 960x720 52.0fps 1024x768 51.5fps 1152x864 49.7fps 1280x960 48.4fps 1600x1200 43.8fps |
|
|
Re: Wapr3D SI: the fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/3 4:40
#23 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2007/1/26 21:48 From New Zealand
Posts: 1617
|
@zzd10h
Quote: Why X1000 is very better than SAM460 on Quake3 and very worst on Cow3D ??? Why the Sam460 would get better results with cow3d is a mystery to me. I get about 95-96 fps (a1_x1000 + HD 7770), and pushing 'b' makes zero difference. For Quake 3, it has the overhead of MiniGL (cow3d is pure Warp3D), and it has other stuff to calculate too. So it's not surprising that the more powerful CPU wins. Hans |
|
_________________
http://hdrlab.org.nz/ - Amiga OS 4 projects, programming articles and more. http://keasigmadelta.co.nz/ - more of my software. |
||
|
Re: Wapr3D SI: the fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/3 5:52
#24 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2012/8/14 12:51 From France
Posts: 1186
|
@Hans
Thank you for the reply. @Alain Any ideas why X1000 is very worst than SAM460 on your Cow3D ? Thx |
|
_________________
http://apps.amistore.net/zTools |
||
|
Re: Warp3D SI : The fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/3 7:33
#25 |
---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() Joined:
2011/6/3 12:49 Posts: 135
|
@Zzd10h
I agree with Hans for quake :it use much the cpu for cow3d only the bus speed may explain the differences Alain |
|
|
Re: Warp3D SI : The fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/3 7:34
#26 |
---|---|---|
Quite a regular
![]() ![]() Joined:
2008/4/10 13:57 From Northern Ireland
Posts: 749
|
for me, cow3d under wazp3d works, but reports 0FPS.
Why is this? |
|
|
Re: Warp3D SI : The fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/3 9:41
#27 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2012/8/14 12:51 From France
Posts: 1186
|
@thellier
Thanks for explanation. Therefore it means that X1000 have the worst bus speed ? Even worst than a SAM460... strange. |
|
_________________
http://apps.amistore.net/zTools |
||
|
Re: Warp3D SI : The fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/3 12:09
#28 |
---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() Joined:
2014/6/29 14:12 From Montserrat
Posts: 88
|
Sam460ex - Radeon HD7750
Quake3 640x480 - 37.8 FPS 800x600 - 32.9 FPS 1024x768 - 31.6 FPS 1280x1024 - 29.9 FPS 1600x1200 - 28.4 FPS With default settings (640x480) 34.3 FPS Edited by Spectre660 on 2015/4/3 13:28:29
Edited by Spectre660 on 2015/4/6 14:05:34 Edited by Spectre660 on 2015/4/6 15:19:47 |
|
|
Re: Warp3D SI : The fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/3 19:28
#29 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2007/1/26 21:48 From New Zealand
Posts: 1617
|
@zzd10h
Quote: Therefore it means that X1000 have the worst bus speed ? Even worst than a SAM460... strange. No, the X1000 has a faster FSB and larger caches. If also gets faster transfer rates to VRAM than the Sam460. So, something else must be at play here. Hans |
|
_________________
http://hdrlab.org.nz/ - Amiga OS 4 projects, programming articles and more. http://keasigmadelta.co.nz/ - more of my software. |
||
|
Re: Warp3D SI : The fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/3 19:38
#30 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2012/8/14 12:51 From France
Posts: 1186
|
@Hans
Maybe related than the only users that complains about slowness of FE (compared to 4.1.6) are X1000 users (me, Raziel, xenic, Guibrush, K-L and certainly more) and no SAM460 users have reported some slowness. Maybe ? |
|
_________________
http://apps.amistore.net/zTools |
||
|
Re: Wapr3D SI: the fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/3 19:43
#31 |
---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() Joined:
2011/6/3 12:49 Posts: 135
|
@zzd10h
>Yes, I tested it, Bears or all your others animated objects work fine. (RxMicrobe3D too) Many thanks again Guillaume Alain PS: For those who dont know Microbe3D available on Aminet : https://www.youtube.com/user/wazp3d |
|
|
Re: Wapr3D SI: the fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/3 20:04
#32 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2012/8/14 12:51 From France
Posts: 1186
|
@thellier
You are welcome ! see here : http://www.amigans.net/modules/xforum ... t_id=96529#forumpost96529 Edited by zzd10h on 2015/4/3 20:29:09
|
|
_________________
http://apps.amistore.net/zTools |
||
|
Re: Warp3D SI : The fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/4 8:33
#33 |
---|---|---|
Quite a regular
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/11/27 17:23 Posts: 535
|
I remember a Frieden talking at one point about how Q3 was spending most of its time in inefficiencies in the way the 2D talks to the 3D subsystem, is that why results aren't as fast as they should be on q3?
I get just over 21fps on q3 on my A1 (800MHz, Radeon 9250), but it should really be higher. Didn't FE change the graphics subsystem? Does minigl need to be updated to work more efficiently? |
|
_________________
-- Ian Gledhill ian.gledhill@btinternit.com (except it should be internEt of course...!) Check out my company's shop: http://www.mutant-caterpillar.co.uk/shop/ - specialising in Sinclair Spectrums but will be adding Amigas! |
||
|
Re: Warp3D SI : The fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/4 14:20
#34 |
---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() Joined:
2013/10/23 14:18 From Kuusamo, Finland
Posts: 53
|
Owner: Breed
HW: X1000 with Radeon HD 7750 quake3 timedemo1: 41FPS cow3d: 90-95FPS |
|
_________________
\o/....X1000....\o/ |
||
|
Re: Wapr3D SI: the fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/5 6:34
#35 |
---|---|---|
Quite a regular
![]() ![]() Joined:
2008/3/11 8:29 From Dunedin, New Zealand
Posts: 867
|
@Hans
>> and pushing 'b' makes zero difference When I press b I go from 95 to 97 Not a big difference no! |
|
_________________
~Yes I am a Kiwi, No, I did not appear as an extra in 'Lord of the Rings'~ 1x AmigaOne X5000 2.0GHz 2gM RadeonR9280X AOS4.x 3x AmigaOne X1000 1.8GHz 2gM RadeonHD7970 AOS4.x |
||
|
Re: Wapr3D SI: the fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/5 10:52
#36 |
---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() Joined:
2014/6/29 14:12 From Montserrat
Posts: 88
|
@Slayer
I go for 119 to 144 . |
|
|
Re: Wapr3D SI: the fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/5 13:37
#37 |
---|---|---|
Not too shy to talk
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/11/28 22:14 Posts: 287
|
@SinanSam460
Quote:
really interested to that point... |
|
_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY. |
||
|
Re: Warp3D SI : The fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/5 13:41
#38 |
---|---|---|
Quite a regular
![]() ![]() Joined:
2008/4/10 13:57 From Northern Ireland
Posts: 749
|
Still waiting for my card. These Zombie Jesus public holidays are playing havoc with the postal service.
|
|
|
Re: Wapr3D SI: the fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/6 8:37
#39 |
---|---|---|
Quite a regular
![]() ![]() Joined:
2008/3/11 8:29 From Dunedin, New Zealand
Posts: 867
|
@Spectre660
Yes but I think we are just discussing the AmigaOne X1000 here, enjoy the stats while you can ;) |
|
_________________
~Yes I am a Kiwi, No, I did not appear as an extra in 'Lord of the Rings'~ 1x AmigaOne X5000 2.0GHz 2gM RadeonR9280X AOS4.x 3x AmigaOne X1000 1.8GHz 2gM RadeonHD7970 AOS4.x |
||
|
Re: Warp3D SI : The fastest card |
Posted on: 2015/4/6 14:18
#40 |
---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/11/30 18:43 From Norway
Posts: 2416
|
How to test quake3 demo???
|
|
_________________
Sam460 Lite |
||