|
AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/7 17:14
#1 |
---|---|---|
Not too shy to talk
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/1 14:14 From Central Europe
Posts: 457
|
Have you ever wondered what is the speed difference between emulated and "real" Amiga? And what about the performance of AmiKit compared to the other alternatives?
Check the benchmarks. Please let me know if you have any ideas what other methods can be used to measure performance of the emulated environments.. Edited by AmiKit on 2007/4/7 18:25:18
|
|
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/9 23:41
#2 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/6 21:18 From Michigan
Posts: 1027
|
Hi @AmiKit
I love that running kitty! ![]() Well, AmiGod 2 wasn't very useful in the first versions of Euae ; slower than an old 486 PC?! |
|
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/10 10:46
#3 |
---|---|---|
Not too shy to talk
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/1 14:14 From Central Europe
Posts: 457
|
@Snuffy
Cannot you run AmiGOD on A1, outside euae? I would be interested in AmigaOne's CPU marks and Intuition marks. |
|
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/10 16:59
#4 |
---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/11/20 16:26 From Norway
Posts: 2422
|
@AmiKit
I think the intuition speed of a Real Amiga4000 is interesting compared to the emulated boxes. |
|
_________________
(NutsAboutAmiga) Basilisk II for AmigaOS4 AmigaInputAnywhere Excalibur and other tools and apps. |
||
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/10 20:13
#5 |
---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/11/29 0:39 Posts: 12
|
Edited by pixie on 2007/4/18 23:57:26
|
|
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/11 20:38
#6 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/6 21:18 From Michigan
Posts: 1027
|
Hi @AmiKit
The GrimReapers like AmiGOD! ![]() OK, I'll see how it behaves with a CIAgent~ ![]() Some kind of A1/Euae Benchmark program would be nice. I know that Euae with generate about a 4 degrees (Celsius) rise in temperature. The CPUTemp.docky shows that! Euae is hot I tell you! ![]() |
|
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/12 12:19
#7 |
---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/8 13:37 Posts: 40
|
@Snuffy
The same here, but I did some benchmarks. Only how to make such a graph out of it ? |
|
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/13 12:18
#8 |
---|---|---|
Not too shy to talk
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/1 14:14 From Central Europe
Posts: 457
|
@benny
You might want to try OpenOffice... |
|
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/13 18:49
#9 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/6 21:18 From Michigan
Posts: 1027
|
Hi AmiKit
Cannot you run AmiGOD on A1, outside euae? I would be interested in AmigaOne's CPU marks and Intuition marks. Well, AmiGod2 worked with Petunia now. Here's my first test: AmiGOD2 by Lukas Stehlik AmigaOne XE/G4 Gfx system ATI Radeon AGP card 2x Chipset N/A Sfx system AHI 6.6 & SB-128 PowerPC Motorola MPC 7451at800Hz CPU 68k 68020 Workbench V52.1 FPU 68k 68881 Exec V52.2 MMU 68k N/A Setpatch V52.1 Memory 256 MB OS version OS4.0 Final with Petunia 52.1 PCIscan: RV100 Radeon 7000 / Radeon VE (*Power Color SDR 64 MB ram) ? RUNTESTS AmiGOD2 - 2D graphics 800x600x16 800x600x32 draw *27401 *22785 ops/ second box 79622 57907 circle 5602 5583 ellipse 7181 7144 pixel 239300 261055 h-line 92665 79367 v-line 30282 20454 Rotate line 19403 19278 Box tunnel 14452 11141 circle tunnel 880 880 Closest Equivalent Graph 2D: Don Cox *25310 Athlon XP 1700+ GFX TNT2 800x600x32 OS: Amithlon (JIT) AG2 version 26.12.2002 Snuffy *22785 A1-XE/G4 MPC7451at800Hz GFX RV100 Radeon 7000/VE 800x600x32 OS4.0 Final with Petunia AG2 version 15.06.2003 |
|
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/13 20:27
#10 |
---|---|---|
Not too shy to talk
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/1 14:14 From Central Europe
Posts: 457
|
@Snuffy
Only 2D graphs? How many "AmiGod marks" have you achieved? You can find such an info if you enter the AmiGod database. The AmiKit comparison graphs are based on the marks. |
|
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/17 20:22
#11 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/6 21:18 From Michigan
Posts: 1027
|
Hi @AmiKit
How many "AmiGod marks" have you achieved? There are 3 software tests and 3 hardware test. Can't make any hardware tests, the program is way out of date. I have the impression I'm running an Amiga 5000! ![]() 2D graphics Test: 800x600x32 Draw box 57907 op/s '' circle 5583 '' ellipse 7144 '' pixel 261055 '' h-line 79367 '' v-line 20454 Rotate line 19278 Box tunnel 11141 circle tunnel 880 22785 Marks----------------< A1-XE/G4 MPC7451@800MHz 256 MB Ram 25310 Marks----------------------< Athlon XP 1700+ Math 68K Test: 5M add 4.500 s 5M multiply 4.519 s 5M divide 4.599 s 5M rnd(x) 6.239 s 2M sqrt(x) 2.799 s 1M sin(x) 1.379 s 1M log(x) 1.460 s Mandelbrot 5.940 s 88 Marks------------------< A1-XE/G4 MPC7451@800MHz 256 MB Ram 84 Marks ------------------< A4000, 060/60MHz (604e/233MHz), 128MB ram Intuition Test: Open/Close window (50x) 1.220 s Move window (60x) 0.500 s Size window (120x) 0.360 s Window To Front (50x) 1.080 s Print Text (5120x) 2.440 s 591 Marks ----------------------------------< A1-XE/G4 MPC7451@800MHz 256 MB Ram Closest Equivalent: 460 Marks -----------------< A4000, 060/60MHz (604e/233MHz), 128MB ram |
|
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/18 18:53
#12 |
---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/2 18:13 From Sweden
Posts: 243
|
@Snuffy
Did you compare the results with other systems, wich you can within AmiGod 2? It's quite depressing ![]() |
|
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/19 14:19
#13 |
---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() Joined:
2007/4/19 9:29 Posts: 5
|
Errrm.....
How does it compare with OS4 on an A1? It would be funny if emulation on a fast x86 will eventually beat a dedicated PPC mobo like SAM. And while I'm at it. How does the Eye Candy in AmiKit compare to the presentation of OS4? |
|
_________________
Ok. Going back to my happy place now. |
||
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/19 15:45
#14 |
---|---|---|
Illusionist
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/11/29 4:47 Posts: 407
|
Quote:
@BigBentheAussie AmiKit has a theming system called "Morpheuz" that makes it easy to change the look (Birdie patterns, GUI elements, etc.) -- and new themes are being added all the time. Also -- the new 32bit icon_library is very cool. ![]() Screenshot_Normal Screenshot_Selected |
|
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/19 16:16
#15 |
---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/11/20 16:26 From Norway
Posts: 2422
|
@hotrod
I dont think you can trust the results being correct. Because AmigaOS4 behaves differently when it comes to timing, many classic programs contain bugs, they will not read the timer devices as documented, players like Eagleplayers and 303tracker will run too fast under OS4. 1ST: problem: The eclockval structure consists of two long words, but older programs often do there calculation based on static number of tics/sec, or just one of the tow long words. 2EN: problem is JIT often generates some overhead, when generating code, the test routines might not give optimal results. 3RD: Interpreted emulation is way slower then native. 4TH: The application might be using CIA chips, and under OS4 the CIA chips are emulated using ciagent prog, this might not give 100% accurate results. Edited by LiveForIt on 2007/4/19 17:06:03
|
|
_________________
(NutsAboutAmiga) Basilisk II for AmigaOS4 AmigaInputAnywhere Excalibur and other tools and apps. |
||
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/19 17:32
#16 |
---|---|---|
Home away from home
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/11/20 16:26 From Norway
Posts: 2422
|
@BigBentheAussie
Quote:
You easily beat the SAM emulating a old 68k program, but consider this test do not include 3D graphics tests. And AmigaOS3.x emulated on WinUAE to do not have proper access to hardware; this excludes proper support for UBS devices, PCI cards like TV cards and so on. Whit WinUAE limited to 2 MB of chip ram, and that sticks rats ass for many classic applications. Your WinUAE require you to boot your Windows first, real Amiga computers boots whit seconds. And you do not get the memory protection. You do not have Grim Rapier on a classic OS, when you play around older programs they often contains bugs, you will not notice this bugs, and there risk your work be lost. On WinUAE you will not get ABIWorld and Gimp. Oh yes I know you can use windows programs but dont you think that kills the point of AmigaOS running in the first place? |
|
_________________
(NutsAboutAmiga) Basilisk II for AmigaOS4 AmigaInputAnywhere Excalibur and other tools and apps. |
||
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/19 22:26
#17 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/6 21:18 From Michigan
Posts: 1027
|
@hotrod
Forget AmiGOD2; it's old and out-of-date. I has nothing to do with OS4. I wish some A1200s with OS4 running would make some test! I would like to see how an A1 compares to the classical Amiga!!! @BigBentheAussie > And while I'm at it. How does the Eye Candy in AmiKit compare to the presentation of OS4? It looks great, but the price is JIT speed; there is no JIT in Euae. @klesterjr If you got WinUAE ; Euae doesn't have horsepower, or should I say kitty power! :/ |
|
|
Re: AmiKit Benchmarks |
Posted on: 2007/4/20 2:38
#18 |
---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() Joined:
2007/4/15 1:51 From Loveland, Colorado USA
Posts: 169
|
@LiveForIt
Quote:
Actually you can emulate the never-released version of the AGA chipset that supports 16 megs of Chip RAM on WinUAE. |
|