|
Re: SFS (68k) and recycled dir |
Posted on: 2008/3/24 17:56
#21 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/12/1 19:07 From Germany
Posts: 1021
|
@Framiga
Quote: btw ... do you thik is a good idea using SFS with a slighty larger blocksise (1024-2048) for HD recording? (still without .recycled) |
|
|
Re: SFS (68k) and recycled dir |
Posted on: 2008/4/12 5:55
#22 |
---|---|---|
Quite a regular
![]() ![]() Joined:
2008/3/11 8:29 From Dunedin, New Zealand
Posts: 867
|
always been one to have larger buffers... then again I always ensured my Amigas have ample memory too...
my OS4 classic for example has 1024 buffers on all 5 partitions and the AmigaOne has 2048 on all 6 don't settle for anything less... I tell ya! lol |
|
|
Re: SFS (68k) and recycled dir |
Posted on: 2008/4/12 7:10
#23 |
---|---|---|
Just can't stay away
![]() ![]() Joined:
2006/11/30 11:30 From Finland
Posts: 1281
|
@Framiga
Quote:
Not really all that hard to believe. Some large programs can require 512 MB RAM or more to compile, especially if optimisations are enabled. F.e. while I still only had 256 MB I wasn't able to compile flite-1.2 even with -O0 (no optimisations). With 512 MB I can compile all of flite-1.2 except for the 48kHz voice, which still requires too much RAM. Also for one of my TuneNet plugins (GSF IIRC) I had to use -O0 on one of the source files or it would try to allocate about 700 MB of RAM, which of course would fail. |
|
|
Re: SFS (68k) and recycled dir |
Posted on: 2008/4/12 15:00
#24 |
---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() Joined:
2007/5/1 11:59 Posts: 149
|
@salass00
and the 3-4 MB needed to achieve a suitable SFS configuration, could change what? |
|
|
Re: SFS (68k) and recycled dir |
Posted on: 2008/5/23 14:50
#25 |
---|---|---|
Just popping in
![]() ![]() Joined:
2007/9/17 21:59 Posts: 8
|
@Framiga
Quote: have you always used HDInstTools for ALL partitions on that HD? Sorry for the very late reply (forgot this forum). Yes I allways used HDInstTools. |
|